Difference between revisions of "Talk:cpp/regex"

Latest revision as of 09:16, 18 October 2018

Can you mention how you built and tested your example code?

I have cut and pasted the example into an IDE and can't build it with the latest g++. I can build it with clang 3.3 but the example doesn't work.Arbalest 17:50, 2 September 2013 (PDT)

GCC does not (yet) implement any of the standard regex functionality. See here. --P12 19:38, 2 September 2013 (PDT)

Was the example code tested? If so, how was it built?Arbalest 20:18, 2 September 2013 (PDT)

I didn't write that example, but it compiles and runs just as described for me using clang++ with libc++ on Linux. --Cubbi 23:30, 2 September 2013 (PDT)

Yeah, I think I added that one, and I've been mostly relying on clang-3.3 with libc++ on a mac. --Nate 07:37, 3 September 2013 (PDT)

Example code fails to compile with any of the available compilers using "run this code" button as of Jan 9 2014

That is correct; we don't currently have an implementation available for online compilation with sufficient C++11 support. It can be compiled and executed this way: http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/6f09afcbd980dbaa (P12 would probably be the person to ask to use that command line when clang is selected) --Cubbi (talk) 07:28, 9 January 2014 (PST)

I'm working on that. --P12 16:34, 9 January 2014 (PST)

I think this is fixed now. --P12 03:18, 13 January 2014 (PST)

[edit] example word size

The word "People" is not longer than 6 characters, this may lead to confusion with the example.

[edit] compiler support

Mention this? https://stackoverflow.com/a/12665408/8954109 gcc4.8 is what comes with centos7. Still relevant --2001:480:91:FF00:0:0:0:16 10:16, 18 October 2018 (PDT)