Difference between revisions of "Talk:cpp/feature test"
From cppreference.com
< Talk:cpp
(vote) |
m (r: WIP) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:: {{tt|or_else}}.) --[[User:Space Mission|Space Mission]] ([[User talk:Space Mission|talk]]) 16:40, 5 December 2022 (PST) | :: {{tt|or_else}}.) --[[User:Space Mission|Space Mission]] ([[User talk:Space Mission|talk]]) 16:40, 5 December 2022 (PST) | ||
::: I'm indifferent, but if I had to vote, I would go with the former --[[User:Ybab321|Ybab321]] ([[User talk:Ybab321|talk]]) 10:00, 6 December 2022 (PST) | ::: I'm indifferent, but if I had to vote, I would go with the former --[[User:Ybab321|Ybab321]] ([[User talk:Ybab321|talk]]) 10:00, 6 December 2022 (PST) | ||
+ | :::: Yes, and it is slightly easier to add {{ttb|stddoc}} to the end of a table's string. So, WIP.) --[[User:Space Mission|Space Mission]] ([[User talk:Space Mission|talk]]) 10:58, 6 December 2022 (PST) |
Revision as of 10:58, 6 December 2022
Could it be possible to link to the individual papers that introduced or bumped a given feature-test macro? Right now there's this page, which has the macros and the values (but not the papers), or pages like https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/compiler_support/23 which have the paper but not the macros.
- Sounds like a good idea, but good lord would that be a lot of work --Ybab321 (talk) 12:21, 5 December 2022 (PST)
- We should decide the position of Paper(s) column:
- We should decide the position of Paper(s) column:
- 1) | Macro name | Feature | Value | Header | Std | Paper(s) | (i.e. at the end)
- or
- 2) | Macro name | Paper(s) | Feature | Value | Header | Std | (i.e. second column)
- 1) | Macro name | Feature | Value | Header | Std | Paper(s) | (i.e. at the end)
-
or_else
.) --Space Mission (talk) 16:40, 5 December 2022 (PST)- I'm indifferent, but if I had to vote, I would go with the former --Ybab321 (talk) 10:00, 6 December 2022 (PST)
- Yes, and it is slightly easier to add
stddoc
to the end of a table's string. So, WIP.) --Space Mission (talk) 10:58, 6 December 2022 (PST)
- Yes, and it is slightly easier to add
- I'm indifferent, but if I had to vote, I would go with the former --Ybab321 (talk) 10:00, 6 December 2022 (PST)
-