Difference between revisions of "Template talk:langlinks"
From cppreference.com
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:The last couple of validations of that template have tanked the performance, so it definitely seems like it could use some protection. [[Special:Contributions/198.74.34.99|198.74.34.99]] 16:41, 19 January 2023 (PST) | :The last couple of validations of that template have tanked the performance, so it definitely seems like it could use some protection. [[Special:Contributions/198.74.34.99|198.74.34.99]] 16:41, 19 January 2023 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Good idea. I've protected [[Template:langlinks/one]]. [[User:Nate|Nate]] ([[User talk:Nate|talk]]) 17:07, 19 January 2023 (PST) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:07, 19 January 2023
[edit] Protection is not enough
This page is protected but Template:langlinks/one which is transcluded in it is not. It should be protected too since it is being vandalised. Ideally something like cascade protection would be used if it is available. --2A02:586:293F:61B:6585:547:F37B:7117 11:15, 19 January 2023 (PST)
- The last couple of validations of that template have tanked the performance, so it definitely seems like it could use some protection. 198.74.34.99 16:41, 19 January 2023 (PST)
- Good idea. I've protected Template:langlinks/one. Nate (talk) 17:07, 19 January 2023 (PST)
