Difference between revisions of "Template talk:cpp/language/navbar content"
From cppreference.com
(re) |
m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
2. The font for sub-headings (h2) is hardly distinguishable from top level headings (h1). | 2. The font for sub-headings (h2) is hardly distinguishable from top level headings (h1). | ||
| − | 3. The Casts subsection item and page "implicit_casts" has the link text "Standard Conversions". That's fine with me but is that ubiquitously synonymous for all of the intended audience? | + | 3. The Casts subsection item and page "implicit_casts" has the link text "Standard Conversions". That's fine with me but is that ubiquitously synonymous for all of the intended audience? [[User:Arbalest|Arbalest]] 07:07, 17 February 2012 (PST) |
: 1. Yes, sure. The only problem with additional subtitles is that the sidebar is very long already, and subtitles potentially waste space. But let's keep them, there should be another way to solve this issue. | : 1. Yes, sure. The only problem with additional subtitles is that the sidebar is very long already, and subtitles potentially waste space. But let's keep them, there should be another way to solve this issue. | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
: 2. I've fixed that. | : 2. I've fixed that. | ||
| − | : 3. Which one would you prefer? I've heard all three used | + | : 3. Which one would you prefer? I've heard all three used frequently: "standard conversions", "implicit conversions", "implicit casts". I'd vote for the second though. |
| + | |||
| + | :: "implicit conversions" is fine with me. [[User:Arbalest|Arbalest]] 07:07, 17 February 2012 (PST) | ||
: BTW, could you sign your posts with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. It's easier to keep track of the discussion then. [[User:P12|P12]] 01:51, 17 February 2012 (PST) | : BTW, could you sign your posts with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. It's easier to keep track of the discussion then. [[User:P12|P12]] 01:51, 17 February 2012 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: OK [[User:Arbalest|Arbalest]] 07:07, 17 February 2012 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 07:07, 17 February 2012
1. The Utilities section on the actual page http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language has 3 subtitles. Should those be reflected in the sidebar content as well? (Since the Types section has subtitles I will add them here)
2. The font for sub-headings (h2) is hardly distinguishable from top level headings (h1).
3. The Casts subsection item and page "implicit_casts" has the link text "Standard Conversions". That's fine with me but is that ubiquitously synonymous for all of the intended audience? Arbalest 07:07, 17 February 2012 (PST)
- 1. Yes, sure. The only problem with additional subtitles is that the sidebar is very long already, and subtitles potentially waste space. But let's keep them, there should be another way to solve this issue.
- 2. I've fixed that.
- 3. Which one would you prefer? I've heard all three used frequently: "standard conversions", "implicit conversions", "implicit casts". I'd vote for the second though.
- "implicit conversions" is fine with me. Arbalest 07:07, 17 February 2012 (PST)
- BTW, could you sign your posts with ~~~~. It's easier to keep track of the discussion then. P12 01:51, 17 February 2012 (PST)
- OK Arbalest 07:07, 17 February 2012 (PST)
