Difference between revisions of "Talk:cpp/container/unordered map"
From cppreference.com
m (Fixing insert link) |
m (Updating, incorrect assumption) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I already made mention in {{lc|std::unordered_map::insert}} about Iterator invalidation being incorrect compared to the standard, but it looks like it is more wide spread for std::unordered_map. --[[User:ReDucTor|ReDucTor]] ([[User talk:ReDucTor|talk]]) 18:53, 11 January 2016 (PST) | I already made mention in {{lc|std::unordered_map::insert}} about Iterator invalidation being incorrect compared to the standard, but it looks like it is more wide spread for std::unordered_map. --[[User:ReDucTor|ReDucTor]] ([[User talk:ReDucTor|talk]]) 18:53, 11 January 2016 (PST) | ||
| + | ::This was an incorrect thanks to [[User:T. Canens|T. Canens]] for pointing out [http://eel.is/c++draft/unord.req#9 <nowiki>[unord.req]/9</nowiki>], 14-15. --[[User:ReDucTor|ReDucTor]] ([[User talk:ReDucTor|talk]]) 14:47, 12 January 2016 (PST) | ||
Latest revision as of 14:47, 12 January 2016
[edit] Iterator invalidation
I already made mention in std::unordered_map::insert about Iterator invalidation being incorrect compared to the standard, but it looks like it is more wide spread for std::unordered_map. --ReDucTor (talk) 18:53, 11 January 2016 (PST)
- This was an incorrect thanks to T. Canens for pointing out [unord.req]/9, 14-15. --ReDucTor (talk) 14:47, 12 January 2016 (PST)
