Namespaces
Variants
Views
Actions

Copy elision

From cppreference.com
< cpp‎ | language
Revision as of 11:37, 17 November 2019 by D41D8CD98F (Talk | contribs)

 
C++
 
C++ language
General topics
Flow control
Conditional execution statements
if
Iteration statements (loops)
for
range-for (C++11)
Jump statements
Functions
Function declaration
Lambda function expression
inline specifier
Dynamic exception specifications (until C++17*)
noexcept specifier (C++11)
Exceptions
Namespaces
Types
Specifiers
const/volatile
decltype (C++11)
auto (C++11)
constexpr (C++11)
consteval (C++20)
constinit (C++20)
Storage duration specifiers
Initialization
Expressions
Alternative representations
Literals
Boolean - Integer - Floating-point
Character - String - nullptr (C++11)
User-defined (C++11)
Utilities
Attributes (C++11)
Types
typedef declaration
Type alias declaration (C++11)
Casts
Memory allocation
Classes
Class-specific function properties
explicit (C++11)
static

Special member functions
Templates
Miscellaneous
 
Initialization
 

Omits copy and move(since C++11) constructors, resulting in zero-copy pass-by-value semantics.

When an object is initialized from a prvalue of the same type (ignoring cv-qualification), it's initialized directly from the initializer. No temporary is created, and no copy or move is made. This is sometimes called "guaranteed copy elision", though unlike copy elision, it's mandatory and is not merely an optimization.

(since C++17)

Contents

Explanation

Under the following circumstances, the compilers are permitted, but not required to omit the copy and move(since C++11) construction of class objects even if the copy/move(since C++11) constructor and the destructor have observable side-effects. The objects are constructed directly into the storage where they would otherwise be copied/moved to. This is an optimization: even when it takes place and the copy/move(since C++11) constructor is not called, it still must be present and accessible (as if no optimization happened at all), otherwise the program is ill-formed:

  • In a return statement, when the operand is the name of a non-volatile object with automatic storage duration, which isn't a function parameter or a catch clause parameter, and which is of the same class type (ignoring cv-qualification) as the function return type. This variant of copy elision is known as NRVO, "named return value optimization".
  • In the initialization of an object, when the source object is a nameless temporary and is of the same class type (ignoring cv-qualification) as the target object. When the nameless temporary is the operand of a return statement, this variant of copy elision is known as RVO, "return value optimization".
(until C++17)

Please note that since C++17, the above optimization becomes mandatory and is no longer considered as an optimization anymore. The object is initialized directly from a prvalue. No temporary exists and no copy/move operation takes place, even conceptually. Another way to describe C++17 mechanics is "unmaterialized value passing": prvalues are returned and used without ever materializing a temporary. 

T f() {
    return T();
}
 
f(); // only one call to default constructor of T
 
T x = T(T(f())); // only one call to default constructor of T, to initialize x
 (since C++17)
  • In a throw-expression, when the operand is the name of a non-volatile object with automatic storage duration, which isn't a function parameter or a catch clause parameter, and whose scope does not extend past the innermost try-block (if there is a try-block).
  • In a catch clause, when the argument is of the same type (ignoring cv-qualification) as the exception object thrown, the copy of the exception object is omitted and the body of the catch clause accesses the exception object directly, as if caught by reference (there cannot be a move from the exception object because it is always an lvalue). This is disabled if such copy elision would change the observable behavior of the program for any reason other than skipping the copy constructor and the destructor of the catch clause argument (for example, if the catch clause argument is modified, and the exception object is rethrown with throw).
(since C++11)
  • In coroutines, copy/move of the parameter into coroutine state may be elided where this does not change the behavior of the program other than by omitting the calls to the parameter's constructor and destructor. This can take place if the parameter is never referenced after a suspension point or when the entire coroutine state was never heap-allocated in the first place.
(since C++20)

When copy elision occurs, the implementation treats the source and target of the omitted copy/move(since C++11) operation as simply two different ways of referring to the same object, and the destruction of that object occurs at the later of the times when the two objects would have been destroyed without the optimization (except that, if the parameter of the selected constructor is an rvalue reference to object type, the destruction occurs when the target would have been destroyed)(since C++17).

Multiple copy elisions may be chained to eliminate multiple copies. 

struct A {
    void *p;
    constexpr A(): p(this) {}
};
 
constexpr A g()
{
    A a;
    return a;
}
 
constexpr A a;          // a.p points to a
// constexpr A b = g(); // error: b.p would be dangling and would point to a temporary
                        // with automatic storage duration
 
void g()
{
    A c = g();          // c.p may point to c or to an ephemeral temporary
}
 
extern const A d; 
constexpr A f()
{
    A e;
    if (&e == &d)
        return A();
    else
        return e;
    // mandating NRVO in constant evaluation contexts would result in contradiction
    // that NRVO is performed if and only if it's not performed
} 
// constexpr A d = f(); // error: d.p would be dangling
 (since C++14)

Notes

Copy elision is the only allowed form of optimization(until C++14)one of the two allowed forms of optimization, alongside allocation elision and extension,(since C++14) that can change the observable side-effects. Because some compilers do not perform copy elision in every situation where it is allowed (e.g., in debug mode), programs that rely on the side-effects of copy/move constructors and destructors are not portable.

In a return statement or a throw-expression, if the compiler cannot perform copy elision but the conditions for copy elision are met or would be met, except that the source is a function parameter, the compiler will attempt to use the move constructor even if the object is designated by an lvalue; see return statement for details.

(since C++11)

Example

Run this code
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
 
struct Noisy {
    Noisy() { std::cout << "constructed\n"; }
    Noisy(const Noisy&) { std::cout << "copy-constructed\n"; }
    Noisy(Noisy&&) { std::cout << "move-constructed\n"; }
    ~Noisy() { std::cout << "destructed\n"; }
};
 
std::vector<Noisy> f() {
    std::vector<Noisy> v = std::vector<Noisy>(3); // copy elision when initializing v
                                                  // from a temporary (until C++17)
                                                  // from a prvalue (since C++17)
    return v; // NRVO from v to the result object (not guaranteed, even in C++17)
}             // if optimization is disabled, the move constructor is called
 
void g(std::vector<Noisy> arg) {
    std::cout << "arg.size() = " << arg.size() << '\n';
}
 
int main() {
    std::vector<Noisy> v = f(); // copy elision in initialization of v
                                // from the temporary returned by f() (until C++17)
                                // from the prvalue f() (since C++17)
    g(f());                     // copy elision in initialization of the parameter of g()
                                // from the temporary returned by f() (until C++17)
                                // from the prvalue f() (since C++17)
}

Possible output: 

constructed
constructed
constructed
constructed
constructed
constructed
arg.size() = 3
destructed
destructed
destructed
destructed
destructed
destructed


Defect reports

The following behavior-changing defect reports were applied retroactively to previously published C++ standards.

DR Applied to Behavior as published Correct behavior
CWG 2022 C++14 copy elision was optional in constant expressions copy elision mandatory
CWG 2278 C++14 NRVO was mandatory in constant expressions forbid NRVO in constant expressions

See also

Retrieved from "https://en.cppreference.com/mwiki/index.php?title=cpp/language/copy_elision&oldid=113451"