Namespaces
Variants
Views
Actions

Talk:cpp/types/conditional

From cppreference.com
< Talk:cpp‎ | types
Revision as of 12:12, 28 October 2011 by P12 (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Hi Cubbi. You're use typeid here too. Why? It confuses newbies. Either comment all examples that each compiler has it's own output or attach result of all compilers. The best is remove typeid/type_info in all examples.

Thanks.

I did not write this example. --Cubbi 03:14, 28 October 2011 (PDT)
I'm sorry. After the example for remove_cv, I thought it was you. But in any case, I think that in the examples it is needed to get rid of typeid/type_info. Yes, now I can see that P12 has written such an example.
In my opinion it's a better idea to use typeid than is_same in examples when we need to know the actual type of a variable. In these cases typeid(*).name() is used exactly as it is supposed to be used - for debugging purposes. P12 13:12, 28 October 2011 (PDT)