User talk:Fruderica
Contents |
zh
Hi, you seem to be interested in the foreign language links, could you chime in the discussion at Talk:Main_Page#Usefulness_of_translated_sites? --Cubbi (talk) 05:56, 23 January 2017 (PST)
Issues
Normally we don't do them until they are actually voted in (in a few weeks). Also, given the paper to rename all the concepts (P1754), I'd recommend putting the ranges stuff on the backburner until the committee makes up its mind. T. Canens (talk) 19:26, 25 June 2019 (PDT)
Editor
Is there a recommendation for an editor--I don't see an option similar to Wikipedia and I'm currently using Visual Studio with a MediaWiki plugin, but it's not very helpful other than marking the headers in blue, italics and bold. ticotico (talk) 13:28, 18 March 2020 (PDT)
I guess that Help:Manual of style may help you. --Fruderica (talk) 19:15, 18 March 2020 (PDT)I'm sorry that I get it wrong. I usually edit MediaWiki texts in browsers and haven't found a plugin good enough. --Fruderica (talk) 19:44, 18 March 2020 (PDT)
Missing list item text
Need help a defect report that is missing text in the Spanish version. The last item at the Informes de Defectos at https://es.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/copy_constructor does not show previous behavior. If I use the English version, it works, but not in Spanish. I've updated the templates to match the English ones, to no avail. The text is there for the previous behavior, but it does not show. Any pointers? ticotico (talk) 19:11, 27 April 2020 (PDT)
- I guess that I've fixed the issue by adding
before=
to the text. The parameter name (before
) must be specified. --Fruderica (talk) 03:31, 28 April 2020 (PDT)
Splitting Compiler Support pages
Are you sure about the split of "compiler support" page you did today? I liked it the way it was, cause I could always look and see all the changes that were made to, let's say, C++20 support in last month. Now not only it is separated, so I need to look thru library and language support separately, but also the pages that contain the actual array that is changed are inaccessible.
It was my weekly routine, to check if there are any changes on this page, now it will be much harder :C
- Actually the page was splitted a half year ago (request), not by me, and then links to each version were added to the main page.
- Splitting core and library features is proposed by an administrator.
- I think I just "regularized" these changes. You can still see cpp/compiler support for full information, and Talk:cpp/compiler support for why these changes are made. --Fruderica (talk) 18:54, 11 August 2020 (PDT)
Redundant inlines
These inlines you're removing aren't redundant, they're needed to give the variable templates external linkage, without them we can't depend on their address being the same amongst different TUs (demo) --Ybab321 (talk) 07:21, 24 July 2024 (PDT)
- They are. See CWG issue 2387, which is just not implemented by GCC yet. Opened GCC Bugzilla #116077. --Fruderica (talk) 10:36, 24 July 2024 (PDT)
- Ah, very good! I saw that wording in the standard and disregarded it thinking that "non-template variables" refer to templated variables such as static data members of class templates and did not refer to variable templates (and of course the note doesn't clarify anything because of the existence of
inline
). I'm quite happy with this result, thanks for proving me wrong :D --Ybab321 (talk) 11:56, 24 July 2024 (PDT)
- Ah, very good! I saw that wording in the standard and disregarded it thinking that "non-template variables" refer to templated variables such as static data members of class templates and did not refer to variable templates (and of course the note doesn't clarify anything because of the existence of