User:T. Canens/LWG issues not yet applied
From cppreference.com
| Issue # | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| LWG 2139 | ✘ Not done | "program-defined", library-wide wording |
| LWG 3062 | ✘ Won't fix | more decay/remove_cvref on pre-C++20 stuff. Not bothering. |
| LWG 3071 | ✘ Not done | Networking TS |
| LWG 2164 | ✘ Not done | |
| LWG 3039 | ✘ Won't fix | decay/remove_cvref again. I don't want to revbox this thing. |
| LWG 3002 | ✘ Not done | Networking TS |
| LWG 3010 | ✘ Not done | Networking TS |
| LWG 3020 | ✘ Not done | Networking TS |
| LWG 2779 | ✘ Not done | Networking TS |
| LWG 2978 | ✔ Done | Might be DR |
| LWG 2998 | ✘ Not done | Just needs a {{dr list}} on the affected functions. |
| LWG 2593 | ✘ Not done | Need to figure out if this should get the DR treatment. |
| LWG 2932 | ✘ Not done | More blanket wording. And did they really wordsmith the PR? unexplained "@=" when "compound assignment" will do? "relevant concept"? |
| LWG 2954 | ✘ Not done | More blanket wording. |
| LWG 2974 | ✘ Not done | Want to see if implementers treat this as a DR first - they probably will. |
| LWG 2795 | ✘ Not done | Where do we put global library wording again? |
| LWG 2903 | ✘ Not done | |
| LWG 2514 | ✘ Not done | this needs to go...somewhere. Not sure where. |
| LWG 2584 | ✘ Not done | |
| LWG 2760 | ✘ Not done | We don't have any summary on iterator invalidation for basic_string?
|
| LWG 2393 | ✘ Not done | Lvalue-Callable. I want to burn this thing to the ground. (Seriously, do we want to rename Callable? |
| LWG 2542 | ✘ Not done | We need to finish AssociativeContainer, and/or add a note for all containers involved. |
| LWG 2436 | ✘ Not done | Like 2542. |
| LWG 2181 | ✘ Not done | need to check everything taking a seed sequence |
| LWG 2426 | ✘ Not done | |
| LWG 2309 | ✘ Not done | |
| LWG 2710 | ✘ Not done | |
| LWG 2685 | ✘ Not done | |
| LWG 2689 | ✘ Not done | |
| LWG 2555 | ✘ Not done | |
| LWG 2451 | ✘ Not done | |
| LWG 2573 | ✘ Not done | |
| LWG 2551 | ✘ Not done | |
| LWG 2516 | ✘ Not done | |
| LWG 2509 | ✘ Not done | |
| LWG 2704 | ✘ Not done | |
| LWG 2711 | ✘ Not done | CONSTRAIN THEM ALL!!!! |
| LWG 2718 | ✘ Not done | |
| LWG 2726 | ✘ Not done | This is about the most annoying specification ever. |
| LWG 2192 | ✘ Not done | |
| LWG 2579 | ✘ Not done | |
| LWG 2583 | ✔ Done | Applied by Cubbi (possible dr list material) |
| LWG 2590 | ✘ Not done | |
| LWG 2259 | ✘ Not done | Same problem as LWG 2224, below |
| LWG 2224 | ✘ Not done | I don't see a good place to apply it. Many parts of clause 17 (e.g., the prohibition against instantiating std:: templates with incomplete types or the leeway granted to implementers on member function signatures, see LWG2259 above) don't appear to be in cppreference. |
